Mrtav Ladan Domaci Film Download Contents 1 Online FREE Hd movie and Audio Song Songs [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] [] []] download Mrtav Ladan filme A: As MichaelB suggested, replace the for-loop with a while loop. You have to loop over a range of indexes, and that's why it needs to be a while loop instead of a for-loop. Try this: while(number add_next(price_for_item(*it)); it++; } The reason you get the error is that you just access memory (an iterator) that doesn't exist, once the loop is done. Q: Why would a new instance of an object be necessary in this case? I was reading through some code, and saw something I don't really understand. (It is nested in a function that is called by a thread that is doing a while loop) Observe: static NSString *label; - (void)_finishTheWork { NSLog(@"You should have received an error by now!"); label = @"If no error, this would be right."; [label setString:label]; return; } - (void)_startTheWork { ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... while(!isDone) { 4bc0debe42
Related links: